Main

Studies

Fellowship

E-Mail

 

Let us Reason Together


Is the Oneness or the Trinity doctrine illogical and unreasonable?

Isa 1:18 Come now, and let us reason together, saith the LORD…. 19 If ye be willing and obedient, ye shall eat the good of the land: 20 But if ye refuse and rebel, ye shall be devoured with the sword: for the mouth of the LORD hath spoken it.

You Trinitarians fail to realize that you are not quoting scripture, indeed cannot, that specifically states that there are three persons in the Godhead. You are merely interpreting events to fit your carnal understanding.

How is it logical or reasonable to interpret an event contrary to scriptural commandments and biblically stated definitions and explanations?

What scripture have you Trinitarians provided, or even exists, that specifically says that Jesus' baptism event is descriptive of the godhead, let alone a declaration of multiple persons in the godhead contrary to scriptural commandments and explicit descriptions of God and Christ?

Where does scripture itself say that a voice from heaven equates to a distinct person in the godhead?

John 5:37 And the Father himself, which hath sent me, hath borne witness of me. Ye have neither heard his voice at any time, nor seen his shape.

What did the voice say? Did the voice say "I am a separate person from the Son"? No, it said-

Mat 3:17 And lo a voice from heaven, saying, This is my beloved Son, **IN WHOM I AM** well pleased.

What did this voice mean- "IN WHOM I AM"?

Col 2:9 For in him dwelleth all the fulness of the godhead bodily. 10 And ye are complete IN HIM,

1 Cor 11:3 …the head of Christ is God.

John 14:10 Believest thou not that I am in the Father, and the Father in me? the words that I speak unto you I speak not of myself: but the father that dwelleth in me, he doeth the works.

John 4:23 …the true worshippers shall worship the Father in spirit and in truth... 24 God is a spirit: and they that worship him must worship him in spirit and in truth.

1 Cor 8:6 But to us there is but one God, the Father,

The following scriptures specifically teach that God is one and the Selfsame Spirit-

1 Cor 12:4 Now there are diversities of gifts, but the same spirit. 5 And there are differences of administrations, but the same Lord. 6 And there are diversities of operations, but it is the same God which worketh all in all. 7 But the manifestation of the Spirit is given to every man to profit withal. 8 For to one is given by the Spirit the word of wisdom… 10 …to another prophecy… 11 But all these worketh that one and the selfsame Spirit, dividing to every man severally as he will. 12 For as the body is one, and hath many members, and all the members of that one body, being many, are one body: so also is Christ.

Who is it that gives these gifts?

1 Corinthians says it is one and the selfsame Spirit. 1 Cor 12:18 & 28 say-

1 Cor 12:18 But now hath God set the members every one of them in the body, as it hath pleased him… 1 Cor 12:28 And God hath set some in the church, first apostles, secondarily prophets, thirdly teachers, after that miracles, then gifts of healings, helps, governments, diversities of tongues.

Remember, the scripture, not I nor my private interpretations nor the mere philosophizing after the traditions of men says-

1 Cor 8:6 But to us there is but one God, the Father,

John 4:23 …the true worshippers shall worship the Father in spirit... 24 GOD IS **A** SPIRIT:

By searching the scriptures as we are commanded to do, we come to Eph 4:8-10, and who is it there that gives the gift and callings in the church?

Eph 4:7 But unto every one of us is given grace according to the measure of the gift of christ. 8 Wherefore he saith, When he ascended up on high, he… gave gifts unto men. 9 (Now that he ascended, what is it but that he also descended first into the lower parts of the earth? 10 He that descended is the same also that ascended up far above all heavens, that he might fill all things.) 11 And he gave some, apostles; and some, prophets;

So then, 1 Cor 12:11 said " all these worketh that one and the selfsame Spirit", and 1 Cor 12:18 & 28 tells us it is "God set the members every one of them in the body, as it hath pleased HIM… And God hath set some in the church… secondarily prophets..." And then Eph 4:7-11 tells us these things are "the gifts of Christ", and that HE is the SAME ALSO that gave prophets. Then when we go back to 1 Corinthians 12, where HE who gives these gifts is being specifically described in the scriptures, the God-breathed word and commandments of God, we find this definition-

1 Cor 12:4 Now there are diversities of gifts, but THE SAME SPIRIT. 5 And there are differences of administrations, but THE SAME LORD. 6 And there are diversities of operations, but it is THE SAME GOD which worketh ALL IN ALL… 11 But ALL THESE WORKETH THAT ONE AND THE SELFSAME SPIRIT, dividing to every man severally as he will. 12 For AS THE BODY IS ONE, and hath many members, and all the members of that one body, being many, are one body: SO ALSO IS CHRIST.

WHO is all in all?

Col 3:11 …CHRIST IS ALL, and in all.

And this is exactly what Jesus testifies to-

Rev 22:16 I JESUS… testify unto you... I am the root **AND** the offspring…

Now, where in scripture is it stated that the subject/object speech has anything more to do than differences of "body members" as soul relates to body, or as the humanity of Jesus relates to deity?

Eph 5:28 So ought men to love their wives as their own bodies. He that loveth his wife loveth himself. 29 For no man ever yet hated his own flesh; but nourisheth and cherisheth it, even as the Lord the church: 30 For we are members of his body, of his flesh, and of his bones.

Since we "love" our bodies, are our bodies separate members of our "head" or soul? Since we are members of Christ's body, does this mean that we are separate members of the GodHEAD?

John 17:11 …Holy Father, keep through thine own name those whom thou hast given me, that they may be one, as we are.

How are we one? Scripture says we are members of His body, not distinct or separate members of the GodHEAD. So what makes Trinitarians think, or what scripture specifically teaches that Christ is not referring to His humanity, and not to some hypothetical separate personage of deity? Or do you think you are going to be a separate person member of the godHEAD, as you claim Jesus is, since we will be one with the Father like Him? Trinitarians simply aren't reading the passages in light of specifically stated scriptural descriptions. Trinitarians are throwing out scriptural descriptions in order to interpret events according to their own opinions and traditions. This is not being logical or reasonable, this is being rebellious, disrespectful, and disobedient!!!

Luke 6:46 And why call ye me, Lord, Lord, and do not the things which I say?

John 5:39 Search the scriptures; for… they are they which testify of me.

Deu 4:2 Ye shall not add unto the word which I command you, neither shall ye diminish ought from it, that ye may keep the commandments of the LORD your God which I command you.

We have relationship between our bodies, and our souls. Jesus Christ has both a fully human body and soul, and all the fulness of the one true God the Father within Him **BODILY**. THEREFORE JESUS IS GOD AND THEN SOME.

John 4:24 God is a Spirit:

Luke 24:39 Behold my hands and my feet, that it is I myself: handle me, and see; for a spirit hath not flesh and bones, as ye see me have.

So what scripture says Jesus can't be and have a fully human personality and at the same time be and have a fully deity personality, and there be conversation between them, without necessarily being distinct persons in the "godHEAD", but merely distinctions in humanity and deity?

1 Tim 2:5 For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, **the (hu)man** Christ Jesus;

Num 23:19 God is not a man… neither the son of man,

Mal 3:6 For I am the LORD, I change not…

1 Tim 3:16 And without controversy great is the mystery of godliness: God was manifest in the flesh, justified in the Spirit, seen of angels, preached unto the Gentiles, believed on in the world, received up into glory.

2 Cor 5:19 To wit, that God was IN Christ, reconciling the world unto himself,

Gen 22:8 And Abraham said, My son, God will provide **Himself** a lamb for a burnt offering: so they went both of them together.

1 Ki 8:27 But will God indeed dwell on the earth? behold, the heaven and heaven of heavens cannot contain thee; how much less this house that I have builded? 28 Yet have thou respect unto the prayer of thy servant, and to his supplication, O LORD my God, to hearken unto the cry and to the prayer, which thy servant prayeth before thee to day: 29 That thine eyes may be open toward this house night and day, even toward the place of which thou hast said, **my name shall be there:** that thou mayest hearken unto the prayer which thy servant shall make toward this place.

Mat 3:17 And lo a voice from heaven, saying, This is my beloved Son, IN WHOM I AM well pleased.

Rom 1:3 Concerning his Son Jesus Christ our Lord, which was made of the seed of david according to the flesh;

John 5:19 Then answered Jesus and said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, The (made of the seed of David flesh) Son can do nothing of (made of the seed of David flesh Son) himself, but what he seeth the (to us there is but one God the) Father do: for what things soever he doeth, these also doeth the (made of the seed of David flesh) Son likewise.

1 Cor 8:6 But to us there is but one God, the Father…

John 14:10 …the (to us there is but one God the) Father that dwelleth in (the made of the seed of David flesh Son) me, he (the to us there is but one God the Father) doeth the works.

John 2:21 But he spake of the temple of his body.

Acts 22:8 And I answered, Who art thou, Lord (Jehovah)? And he said unto me, I AM JESUS of Nazareth, whom thou persecutest.

Isa 9:6 For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given: and the government shall be upon his shoulder: and his name shall be called Wonderful, Counsellor, The mighty God, the Everlasting Father, The Prince of Peace.

Rev 22:16 I Jesus… testify unto you... I am the root AND the offspring (according to the flesh Son) of David…

Where then is scripture which specifically teaches otherwise that the distinctions between the human temple and the one God who dwelled within, and who did the works therein, are distinct members of the godHEAD?

There are none. Not without going outside of the scripture, adding to it, and taking away from it- and how is that reasonable or logical when God has commanded against it?

Deu 12:32 What thing soever I command you, observe to do it: thou shalt not add thereto, nor diminish from it.

Mark 12:29 And Jesus answered him, The first of all the commandments is, Hear, O Israel; THE LORD OUR GOD IS ONE LORD:

John 20:28 And Thomas answered and said unto him, MY LORD AND MY GOD. 29 Jesus saith unto him, Thomas, because thou hast seen me, THOU HAST BELIEVED:

Gal 3:20 …God is one.

Col 3:11 …Christ is all, and in all.

Col 2:10 And ye are complete in him,

Col 2:9 For in him dwelleth ALL the fulness of the Godhead bodily.

Mat 28:18 And Jesus came and spake unto them, saying, ALL power is given unto me in heaven and in earth.

Therefore, if there is any other god or person, they have NO POWER!

Furthermore, to add a description of a Trinity of separate persons in the godhead to the God of the bible is to follow after the pagan descriptions of their deity. How is doing that logical or reasonable when God has also thoroughly forbidden by specifically commanding against that?

Deu 6:14 Ye shall not go after other gods, of the gods of the people which are round about you...

Deu 13:6 If thy brother... entice thee secretly, saying, Let us go and serve other gods, which thou hast not known, thou, nor thy fathers; 7 Namely, of the gods of the people which are round about you, nigh unto thee, or far off from thee... 8 Thou shalt not consent unto him, nor hearken unto him; neither shall thine eye pity him, neither shalt thou spare, neither shalt thou conceal him:"

The Trinitarians looked to the gods which were "round about" them to serve! Who were these "gods" that were "round about" them? None other than the Trinity of Persons in one god!

"It is a solution by harmonization, an attempt to combine, as Gregory of Nyssa characterizes it, the monotheism of the Jews and the polytheism of the Greeks. the method of harmonization used by them was to thin down the Jewish monotheism as a concession to Greek polytheism." -Wolfson, Harry A. "The Philosophy of the Church Fathers", pgs. 578-579, as quoted in After The Way Called Heresy, by Thomas Weisser, page 32.

"In the Trimurti, Brahma... The Lord God, though one without a second, assumes the three forms respectively of Brahma, Vishnu, and Shiva... though three in form, are one entity... It may, however be noted that, whereas the trinity is presented in Scholastic philosophy as a mystery, it is a fundamental definition of Hindu religious philosophy!" -Edward Rice, Eastern Definitions, pg. 387. as quoted in After The Way Called Heresy, by Thomas Weisser, Page 34.

"Mr. Layard, in his last work, has given a specimen of such a triune divinity, worshipped in ancient Assyria. The accompanying cut of such another divinity (trinity), worshipped among the pagans of Siberia..." -Rev. Alexander Hislop, The Two Babylons, pages 16-17.

"The ancient Babylonians, just as the modern Romans, recognized in words the unity of the Godhead; and, while worshipping innumerable minor deities, as possessed of certain influence on human affairs, they distinctly acknowledged that there was one infinite and almighty creator, supreme over all... in the unity of that one only god of the Babylonians, there were three persons..." -Rev. Alexander Hislop, The Two Babylons, pages 14-17.

In the final analysis, all that Trinitarians have to describe their god are the traditions of men, and their ability to lean upon their own understanding. How is this then logical or reasonable in formulating their doctrine, when the Lord has commanded-

Prov 3:5 Trust in the LORD with all thine heart; and lean not unto thine own understanding. 6 In all thy ways acknowledge him, and he shall direct thy paths. 7 Be not wise in thine own eyes: fear the LORD, and depart from evil.

Isa 55:7 Let the wicked forsake his way, and the unrighteous man his thoughts: and let him return unto the LORD, and he will have mercy upon him; and to our God, for he will abundantly pardon. 8 For my thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways my ways, saith the LORD. 9 For as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways, and my thoughts than your thoughts.

When Trinitarians lean unto their own understanding in describing the godhead according to their perceptions and interpretations of events, they aren't being reasonable. They aren't being logical. They are simply being rebellious and disobedient. They can point to no commandment to believe that God is a Trinity of persons yet they command people to believe it. They can point to no scripture that describes or declares God to be a Trinity of persons, yet they take it upon themselves to describe God in this manner contrary to His specifically stated words and commands- even the very first commandment of all! Therefore, they are saying that they know better how to describe God than God Himself in His own Holy Bible that was inspired by Him. They are therefore saying in their hearts that they are greater than God! They are making themselves out to be above God! They are standing in the temple of God, claiming they are the real gods, because in their hearts they feel and are proclaiming that they have the authority to command men to believe according to their understanding, contrary to the commandments of God. Is this logical or reasonable? No- it is rebellion. It is disobedience. It is the spirit of anti-christ. And that is what those who believe that Jesus and the Holy Spirit are separate persons are, according to scripture- little spirits of anti-christ.

1 John 4:2 Hereby know ye the Spirit of God: Every spirit that confesseth that Jesus Christ IS COME in the flesh is of God: 3 And every spirit that confesseth not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is not of God: and this is that spirit of antichrist,

Some have tried to say that this just meant Jesus came in the flesh, past tense. But that cannot be so. For devils did confess that Jesus came in the flesh back then…

Luke 4:33 …a spirit of an unclean devil, and cried out with a loud voice, 34 Saying, Let us alone; what have we to do with thee, thou Jesus of Nazareth? art thou come to destroy us? I know thee who thou art; the Holy One of God. 35 And Jesus rebuked him,… 41 And devils also came out of many, crying out, and saying, Thou art Christ the Son of God. And he rebuking them suffered them not to speak: for they knew that he was Christ.

Some would like to say that 1 John 4:2-3 was merely combating gnosticism. But that interpretation also does not take into account the absolutely clear present tense of the meaning "is come." That Greek word is "elhluqota." This precise, particular word is found in only one other place in the New Testament Scripture-

Acts 18:1 …Paul departed from Athens, and came to Corinth; 2 And found a certain Jew named Aquila, born in Pontus, lately "come" (elhluqota) from Italy, with his wife Priscilla… and came unto them. 3 And …he abode with them, and wrought...

Not lately "left" and gone from Italy.

Not lately "come and gone" from Corinth.

Will any contend that Paul came to, and abode with, Aquila after Aquila left Corinth rather than while he, present tense, "was come"? For John wrote his epistle well after Jesus had come and gone, and John says Jesus "is come in the flesh," just as Aquila was "come," and who therefore, can possibly, reasonably contend otherwise? For Jesus Himself said…

John 14:18 I will not leave you comfortless: I will come to you.

Mat 18:20 For where two or three are gathered together in my name, there am I in the midst of them.

It is a simple matter of fact that John, in 1 John 4:2-3, could have used any of many Greek word forms except "elhluqota" if he wanted to declare that Jesus had come in the flesh in the past tense. But he didn't. John said "is come," present tense, in the flesh. Here and now.

This present tense of Jesus, being "is come," can be shown even more emphatically and irrefutably, through another Greek word "ercomenon" found in 2 John 7…

2 John 1:7 For many deceivers are entered into the world, who confess not that Jesus Christ is come (ercomenon) in the flesh. This is a deceiver and an antichrist.

This particular word "ercomenon" is found in many passages, but it is never found in the past tense. Here are some examples of "ercomenon"…

Mat 3:16 And Jesus, when he was baptized,… he saw the Spirit of God descending like a dove, and lighting (ercomenon) upon him:

Does anyone wish to prove that Jesus saw the Spirit descending after it had come and gone? No? Then John says deceivers and anti-christ confess not that Jesus Christ "is come," present tense, in the flesh, and who will deny it, or try to disprove it, contending, rather, that they are separate or distinct "persons"?

Trinitarians.

Mat 24:30 And then shall appear the sign of the Son of man in heaven… and they shall see the Son of man coming (ercomenon) in the clouds of heaven with power and great glory.

Does anyone wish to prove that they see the Son of man coming in the clouds after he has come and gone? No? Then John says deceivers and anti-christ confess not that Jesus Christ "is come," present tense, in the flesh, and who will deny it, or try to disprove it?

Trinitarians.

Heb 11:6 But without faith it is impossible to please him: for he that cometh (ercomenon) to God must believe that he is, and that he is a rewarder of them that diligently seek him.

Does anyone wish to prove that we have faith in God after we have come to, and left God? No? Then John says deceivers and anti-christ confess not that Jesus Christ "is come," present tense, in the flesh, and who will deny it, or try to disprove it?

Trinitarians.

Every example of ercomenon is only present tense. Never past tense. For other occurrences of ercomenon, see Mat. 16:28, 26:64; Mark 13:26, 14:62, 15:21; Luke 21:27; John 1:9, 1:29, 1:47, 6:37, 10:12; Acts 19:4, and Hebrews 6:7.

2 Cor 13:5 Examine yourselves, whether ye be in the faith; prove your own selves. Know ye not your own selves, how that Jesus Christ is in you, except ye be reprobates?

Col 1:26 Even the mystery which hath been hid from ages and from generations, but now is made manifest to his saints: 27 To whom God would make known what is the riches of the glory of this mystery among the Gentiles; which is Christ in you, the hope of glory:

Rom 8:9 …Now if any man have not the Spirit of Christ, he is none of his. 10 And if Christ be in you, the body is dead because of sin; but the Spirit is life because of righteousness.

So how is it being reasonable for a Trinitarian to say contrarily to these scriptures that the Holy Spirit in the believers is a separate or distinct person from Jesus Christ? Such is not logical, or reasonable. Such as teach or believe that the Holy Spirit is a separate person from Jesus Chris are emphatically declared by the scriptures to be- reprobates (2 Cor 13:5), none of his (Rom 8:9), not His saints (Col 1:26-28), not of God, antichrist (1 John 4:3), and deceivers (2 John 1:7)

1 Cor 12:13 For by one Spirit are we all baptized into one body,

Eph 4:4 There is one body, and one Spirit, even as ye are called in one hope of your calling; 5 One Lord, one faith, one baptism,

John 4:24 God is **A** Spirit:

2 Cor 3:17 Now the Lord is that Spirit:

Acts 10:36 …Jesus Christ: (he is Lord of all:)

Mark 12:29 …The first of all the commandments is, Hear, O Israel; The Lord our God is one Lord:

1 Cor 8:6 But to us there is but one God, the Father, of whom are all things, and we in him; and one Lord Jesus Christ,

John 20:28 And Thomas answered and said unto him, My Lord AND my God. 29 Jesus saith unto him, Thomas, because thou hast seen me, THOU HAST BELIEVED: blessed are they that have not seen, and yet have believed.

But these scriptures aren't enough for Trinitarians. It isn't logical or reasonable enough for Trinitarians to simply hear the word and obey. Trinitarians want me to keep my letters to them shorter. They want to "debate" these things one item at a time. I refuse to do that. I will not "debate" the word of God. I will attempt to convert you by and to the commandments of the scriptures, or we will not have a conversation.

Rom 1:28 And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient; 29 Being filled with ALL UNRIGHTEOUSNESS, fornication, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, MURDER, **DEBATE**, deceit, malignity; whisperers, 30 Backbiters, haters of God, despiteful, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents, 31 Without understanding, covenantbreakers, without natural affection, implacable, unmerciful: 32 Who knowing the judgment of God, that THEY WHICH COMMIT SUCH THINGS ARE WORTHY OF DEATH, not only do the same, but have pleasure in them that do them.

Debate is listed right next to murder in the word of God's list of iniquities!!! And yet that is what Trinitarians want to do with the godhead- debate it!!

What happened to-

John 14:15 If ye love me, keep my commandments.

What are HIS commandments? Number one is-

Mark 12:29 And Jesus answered him, The first of all the commandments is, Hear, O Israel; The Lord our God is one Lord:

BUT NOT TO A TRINITARIAN! TO A TRINITARIAN THE FIRST COMMANDMENT THAT THERE IS ONLY ONE LORD IS OPEN FOR DEBATE!!!

2 Cor 12:20 For I fear, lest, when I come… lest there be DEBATES, envyings, wraths, strifes, backbitings, whisperings, swellings, tumults:

2 Tim 2:14 Of these things put them in remembrance, charging them before the Lord that they STRIVE NOT ABOUT WORDS TO NO PROFIT, BUT TO THE SUBVERTING OF THE HEARERS.

1 Tim 1:5 Now the end of the commandment is charity out of a pure heart, and of a good conscience, and of faith unfeigned: 6 From which some having swerved have turned aside unto vain jangling; 7 Desiring to be teachers of the law; understanding neither what they say, nor whereof they affirm.

I'm not hear to debate the word, GOD FORBID, but to preach the word-

2 Tim 4:1 I charge thee therefore before God, and the Lord Jesus Christ, who shall judge the quick and the dead at his appearing and his kingdom; 2 Preach the word; be instant in season, out of season; reprove, rebuke, exhort with all longsuffering and doctrine. 3 For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; 4 And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables.

Isa 1:18 Come now, and let us reason together, saith the LORD: though your sins be as scarlet, they shall be as white as snow; though they be red like crimson, they shall be as wool. 19 If ye BE WILLING AND OBEDIENT, ye shall eat the good of the land: 20 But if ye refuse and rebel, ye shall be devoured with the sword: for the mouth of the LORD hath spoken it. 21 How is the faithful city become an harlot! it was full of judgment; righteousness lodged in it; but now murderers.

James 1:21 Wherefore lay apart all filthiness and superfluity of naughtiness, and receive with meekness the engrafted word, which is able to save your souls. 22 But be ye doers of the word, and not hearers only, deceiving your own selves.

1 Pet 2:6 Wherefore also it is contained in the scripture, Behold, I lay in Sion a chief corner stone, elect, precious: and he that believeth on HIM (NOT THEM) shall not be confounded. 7 Unto you therefore which believe HE (NOT THEM) is precious: but unto them which be disobedient, the stone which the builders disallowed, the same is made the head of the corner, 8 And a stone of stumbling, and a rock of offence, even to them which stumble at the word, being disobedient: whereunto also they were appointed.

In Jesus precious name- the only name under heaven whereby men must be saved, Acts 4:10-12 (which of course in itself, automatically, logically, and reasonably, excludes the name "Trinity")

Tom Raddatz